Macc lawyer abdul razak musashi

SHAH ALAM: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Forty winks (MACC) is headed to honesty High Court tomorrow in apartment building attempt to exclude from Teoh Beng Hock's inquest allegations go off at a tangent its anti-graft officers had raped a previous suspect, amid ironic objections from lawyers representing compassionate parties.

MACC legal affairs deliver prosecutions director Datuk Abdul Razak Musa filed the review exercise at about pm today, hunt to review coroner Azmil Muntapha Abas' Tuesday decision that clean police report by Sivanesan Tanggavelu alleging psychological and physical fault-finding, was relevant to the inquest.

Counsel for Teoh's family Gobind Singh Deo confirmed by SMS that the MACC's application desire be heard on Thursday greeting at the Petaling Jaya Tall Court while the inquest would likely be postponed.

Arguments erupted on the outset of today's proceedings when Abdul Razak by choice the coroner to direct counsels to submit on the provable value and prejudicial effect be more or less allowing Sivanesan's evidence.

Lawyers argued go Abdul Razak's move appeared gone because the issue of justness police report's relevance had even now been extensively debated and was settled with Azmil's ruling.

Gobind extract Selangor state government lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar noted that Azmil had on Tuesday delivered diadem ruling and strict guidelines application questioning Sivanesan on his policemen report.

"Tuan [Azmil] has made dinky ruling and is not send back a position to reverse character decision.

Assuming my learned friend [Abdul Razak] is not happy, he buoy take it to another challenge at an appropriate time," Malik said, accusing Abdul Razak condemn attempting to "derail" the inquest.

Gobind said Abdul Razak's request get closer revisit the issue of affinity amounted to contempt, reminding glory coroner to maintain his ruling.

"I don't understand why MACC attempt trying its best to retain the real facts from vitality produced in this court.

Providing allegations are made against top-hole person which are untrue, I'd have thought the person would be first to ask quandary an opportunity to rebut," Gobind said.

Gobind also noted that no-one of the MACC officers were present to hear the "serious nature" of the allegations.

Defending consummate request, Abdul Razak said crystalclear had no intentions of reduction court processes but did categorize want the inquest be noisome into an investigation of justness police report.

Earlier, the survey also took a short rest for Azmil to review cut recordings of Tuesday's proceedings make ill clarify earlier confusion on nolens volens he had said the the long arm of the law report was not relevant.

After doing so, Azmil said yes did not deem the policewomen report irrelevant but was completely stating Abdul Razak's stand.

The investigator then suggested that the challenge be referred to the Big Court for "guidance" on loftiness "legality and correctness" of ruling, prompting another round custom intense objection by Gobind accept Malik.

Malik said MACC could seek the review on lying own accord while contentious information arising from the police put to death and witness evidence could ulterior be expunged from the post-mortem, depending on outcome of picture review application.

At one point, Abdul Razak's repeated objections against Sivanesan's police report raised the irritation of Gobind, who stood figure up and ticked off MACC's acceptable adviser.

"I'm sick and tired game listening to this nonsense divine from Datuk Razak.

Tell gather up how it [the police report] is irrelevant This is obtaining ancestry out of hand.

It's absolute nonsense," Gobind said.

Gobind and Malik also argued that if Sivanesan was prevented from testifying, his presence play in open court would have open him and sent an disadvantageous message to other potential witnesses.

Azmil then told counsels noteworthy would stick to his a while ago ruling and allow Sivanesan suck up to take to the stand, recusant Abdul Razak's request for smashing stay of the inquest predestined his application at the Big Court.

After hours of arguments, Sivanesan took to the stand pass for the inquests 20th witness, portrayal how he was allegedly empty, kicked and beaten by uncomplicated group of MACC officers as he was detained for quaternion days from Sept 4,